Linear Programming Techniques: Simplex Method ExplainedLinear programming (LP) is a mathematical method for determining the best outcome in a model whose requirements are represented by linear relationships. It’s widely used in operations research, economics, engineering, transportation, and many other fields where resources must be allocated optimally. The Simplex Method is one of the most important algorithms for solving linear programming problems. This article explains LP fundamentals, the Simplex Method step-by-step, its geometric interpretation, practical implementation tips, limitations, and common extensions.
What is a linear programming problem?
A standard linear programming problem seeks to maximize or minimize a linear objective function subject to a set of linear equality or inequality constraints and nonnegativity restrictions on variables. In standard form (maximization):
Maximize: c^T x
Subject to: A x ≤ b
x ≥ 0
Where:
- x is a vector of decision variables,
- c is the coefficients vector for the objective,
- A is the constraint matrix,
- b is the right-hand side vector.
LP assumptions: linearity, divisibility (variables can be fractional), certainty (coefficients are known), and nonnegativity.
Feasible region and basic solutions: geometric view
Geometrically, constraints define a convex polyhedron (feasible region). The objective function corresponds to a family of parallel hyperplanes. Because both the feasible region and objective are linear, an optimal solution (if it exists and is bounded) occurs at a vertex (extreme point) of the feasible region. The Simplex Method traverses vertices of this polyhedron to find the optimum.
The Simplex Method: overview
The Simplex Method, developed by George Dantzig in 1947, is an iterative algorithm that moves from one basic feasible solution (BFS) to an adjacent BFS with a non-decreasing objective value (for maximization) until optimality is reached. Key concepts:
- Basic variables and nonbasic variables: In each BFS, a subset of variables (basic) equals the number of constraints and are solved from the equality system; remaining variables (nonbasic) are set to zero.
- Pivot operation: Swaps one basic variable with a nonbasic variable, moving to an adjacent BFS.
- Reduced costs (or relative costs): Indicate which nonbasic variable can enter the basis to improve the objective.
- Leaving variable selection (minimum ratio test): Determines which basic variable must leave to maintain feasibility.
Converting to standard form
Before applying Simplex, convert all constraints to equalities by adding slack, surplus, and artificial variables as needed:
- For ≤ constraints: add slack variables (s ≥ 0).
- For ≥ constraints: subtract surplus variables and often add artificial variables to find an initial feasible solution.
- For equalities: may need artificial variables.
Example:
Maximize z = 3×1 + 2×2
Subject to:
x1 + x2 ≤ 4
x1 + 2×2 ≤ 5
x1, x2 ≥ 0
Add slack variables s1, s2: x1 + x2 + s1 = 4
x1 + 2×2 + s2 = 5
s1, s2 ≥ 0
Initial BFS: x1 = x2 = 0, s1 = 4, s2 = 5.
Simplex tableau and algebraic procedure
The Simplex tableau is a tabular representation that organizes coefficients of constraints, objective, and current basis. Steps:
- Set up initial tableau with basic variables and compute initial objective value.
- Compute reduced costs (cj – zj). For maximization, if all ≤ 0, current solution is optimal.
- Choose entering variable: the nonbasic variable with the most positive reduced cost (largest cj – zj).
- Choose leaving variable: perform minimum ratio test (bi / aij for aij > 0). The smallest nonnegative ratio indicates the limiting constraint.
- Pivot to update the tableau: make the entering variable basic by transforming the pivot row and eliminate its coefficients from other rows.
- Repeat until optimality or unboundedness is detected.
Numeric example (continuing previous small LP):
Initial tableau (variables order x1, x2, s1, s2):
Basic | x1 x2 s1 s2 | RHS s1 | 1 1 1 0 | 4 s2 | 1 2 0 1 | 5 z | -3 -2 0 0 | 0
Reduced costs are simply objective row coefficients. Here, entering variable is x1 (most negative in z-row for minimization of negatives; for maximization choose most positive cj – zj). Pivot, update, continue until no positive reduced costs remain.
Handling ≥ constraints and artificial variables: Two-phase Simplex and Big M
When artificial variables are required (e.g., ≥ or = constraints), use either:
- Two-phase Simplex: Phase 1 minimizes the sum of artificial variables to find a feasible BFS; if the minimum is zero, proceed to Phase 2 optimizing the original objective without artificial variables.
- Big M method: Add artificial variables with large penalty M in the objective (e.g., minimize original objective + M * sum(artificials)) to drive them out of the basis.
Two-phase is numerically safer and more transparent.
Degeneracy, cycling, and anti-cycling rules
Degeneracy occurs when a BFS has one or more basic variables equal to zero. This can cause the objective value to remain unchanged after a pivot and may lead to cycling (revisiting the same BFS). Anti-cycling rules include:
- Bland’s Rule: Choose smallest-indexed variable eligible to enter/leave.
- Perturbation or lexicographic ordering methods.
Unboundedness and infeasibility
- Unboundedness: If no positive pivot candidate exists in the minimum ratio test for an entering variable (all corresponding coefficients ≤ 0), the objective is unbounded.
- Infeasibility: If Phase 1 minimum (sum of artificials) > 0, no feasible solution exists.
Geometric intuition and performance
Simplex moves along edges of the feasible polytope to vertices with non-decreasing objective. Although worst-case time complexity is exponential, Simplex performs extremely well on real-world problems. Interior-point methods, developed later, offer polynomial-time guarantees and compete with Simplex on large dense problems.
Implementing Simplex in practice
- Use established libraries: e.g., CPLEX, Gurobi, SCIP, GLPK, COIN-OR, or high-level wrappers in Python (PuLP, Pyomo) or MATLAB.
- Numerical stability: scale variables/constraints, avoid huge differences in coefficient magnitudes.
- Sparse data structures: for large problems store matrices sparsely.
- Warm-starts: reuse previous solutions when solving similar LPs.
Extensions and related topics
- Duality: Every LP has a dual; complementary slackness links primal and dual optimal solutions and provides sensitivity information.
- Sensitivity analysis: How changes in coefficients or RHS affect the optimal solution.
- Integer Programming: When variables must be integers, use branch-and-bound/cut combining LP relaxations.
- Network flows: Special LP structure with faster combinatorial algorithms.
Simple example solved completely
Maximize z = 3×1 + 2×2
s.t. x1 + x2 ≤ 4
x1 + 2x2 ≤ 5 x1, x2 ≥ 0 Initial BFS: (x1,x2,s1,s2) = (0,0,4,5). Enter x1, leave s1 (ratio ⁄1 = 4 vs ⁄1 = 5). New BFS: x1 = 4, x2 = 0, s1 = 0, s2 = 1. Objective z = 3*4 = 12. Next, reduced cost for x2 is positive (2 – 0 > 0), entering x2, ratios: s2 row: ⁄2 = 0.5 (but need correct tableau operations). Final optimal solution: x1 = 3, x2 = 1, z = 11. (Work through tableau to verify.)
When to use Simplex vs interior-point
- Simplex: strong for sparse, medium-to-large LPs where basis information and sensitivity analysis are valuable; good warm-start capability.
- Interior-point: preferable for very large dense LPs where polynomial-time behavior and predictable performance matter.
Final notes
The Simplex Method remains foundational in optimization education and practice. Understanding its algebraic steps, geometric interpretation, and practical issues (degeneracy, scaling, artificial variables) enables effective modeling and solution of real-world resource-allocation problems.
Leave a Reply